1/72 Grahame-White Type X 'Charabanc'

KIT #:
PRICE:
DECALS:
REVIEWER: Stephen Foster
NOTES: Scratchbuilt

HISTORY

Claude Grahame-White founded an aeroplane manufacturing company at Hendon in 1911 to cover his interests in heavier-than-air flying machines. His importance to British aviation was considerable as he fostered interest in flying among the general public in Britain. He opened a flying school at Brooklands but moved it to Hendon where it became the busiest in Europe, holding regular weekly displays and races. His chief designer was John Dudley North who later became the chief designer for Boulton and Paul. White’s company produced a number of original, (and sometimes odd, not to say bizarre), biplanes, many of them pushers, of which the Type X was one. Part of the attraction of Hendon to the general public was the flying of passengers around the aerodrome. However most aircraft could only carry one or at most two passengers, and White saw an opportunity to meet extra demand by building a larger capacity aeroplane. The Type X was designed by J. D. North to carry 4 passengers in wicker seats behind the pilot and started to offer rides in September 1913. It was quickly dubbed the "Charabanc" by the public after the buses used to take holiday makers on day trips and outings to coastal resorts. It also had a very large silencer fitted to the exhaust and a klaxon on the port side of the nacelle which could be easily heard on the ground as the aircraft flew over the crowds.

On 2nd October a record was set when 9 passengers were carried for nearly 20 minutes: later 10 passengers were taken aloft - a world record for a heavier-than-air machine at the time. On 9 May 1914 W. Newall made the first jump from an aeroplane in Britain using a parachute. Newell sat on a rope seat which had been rigged between the front and diagonal struts on the port side of the undercarriage, with his feet braced against the skid. He had the parachute on his lap with a release cord in his hand. F. Goodden climbed out of the nacelle when the aeroplane had reached 2000 feet and pushed Newell off his seat with his foot! Other stunts carried out with this machine included having two people sit on the lower wing tips holding on to the struts while it was in the air.

The machine was powered by a 120 hp Austro-Daimler engine, but prior to November 1913 this was replaced by a 100 hp Green engine so that the Charabanc could enter the all-British manufactured aircraft race - the Michelin Cup No 1, a 300 mile to and fro route between Hendon, north of London to Brooklands in Surrey, south west of London. The Charabanc won this competition. Grahame-White attempted a London-Paris flight but was forced to land at Folkestone with a fuel leak. The Royal Aero Club states that the machine was sold to the Japanese Navy in 1916.

The Charabanc was the largest aeroplane to be built in Britain prior to the outbreak of the First World War, and many modifications and changes were made when it was in service. The klaxon was removed and replaced by a long step to allow passengers easier access to the cockpit and a gravity tank was put under the top wing. The camber of the wings was very marked in order to increase the lift but this slowed the machine down to a speed of about 45 mph in the air.

During WW1 White’s company was contracted to build aircraft for the RNAS but in 1917 a dispute arose over the quality of the workmanship. Due to shortages, low quality wood was being delivered to the company and used in construction, so the aircraft were rejected for use. From 1919 Grahame-White attempted to build large commercial aircraft but without real success. The dispute with the government over the failure to deliver aircraft during the war continued after the war had ended and in 1921 the Admiralty took over the Hendon site in lieu of outstanding debts. Hendon aerodrome was passed to the RAF and was the site for continued air pageants during the interwar years. After the Second World War the airfield was sold and became a housing estate, but the hangars and office buildings were retained and now house part of the RAF museum collection.

CONSTRUCTION

My first task was to find some drawings: fortunately Flight Magazine came up trumps: the drawings look a little crude but they have the dimensions on them which means that even if the outlines are not wholly accurate, the dimensions will be. There are also a large number of photographs which show that the machine changed in detail during its short life: as most of the photos are undated a little research was necessary to put them into some form of chronological order. I cannot argue that what I have produced is 100% accurate, but then nobody can prove otherwise - always an advantage when scratch building one of these rarer types!

I made the wings and tail surfaces from 30 thou plastic card which had been bent in a pipe filled with hot water. The camber of both wings and tail surfaces was quite marked as shown on the drawings and is evident in the photographs. Ribs were added by gluing 10 x 20 thou Evergreen strip to the upper surfaces and when dry sanding them down until they only just protrude above the surface. Struts were cut and shaped from 30 x 40 thou Evergreen strip. The fuselage nacelle was cut form 20 thou card: two sides and a one piece bottom/nose. The latter was curved by sliding the plastic between the blade of a pair of scissors and my thumb - in the same way as ribbon can be made to curl. In order to keep the structure square I inserted some scrap plastic to the joint between the fuselage floor and sides and braced the structure with small squares of thick plastic card while the cement dried. The squares were removed later. The empty nacelle was cemented to the lower wing after the internal structure and bracing had been added and the interior painted. The cockpit is very open and visible so I added rudder pedals, a wooden slatted floor, instrument bar, and fuel and oil tanks at the rear. The seats were wicker on the original craft and Barracuda make some excellent resin products which proved to be ideal for this project: indeed arguably they made it a possibility as I would not wish to make 5 of these from scratch. Cushions to spare the fare paying public from discomfort were made from card. The remaining interior details were added to the nacelle.

The engine that I chose to represent was the 120 hp Beardmore. This was quite a complex looking object but there are good scale drawings available and the WingnutWings website has lots of information. I was also fortunate to own a WNW kit of a Beardmore which I could refer to for some details. The sump was made from laminated card and the cylinders from rod. Pieces of strip and small lumps of laminated card became the different external features, with thin wire the pipes on the sides of the cylinders. The overhead valve gear was made from small scraps of plastic, and squares of plastic and short lengths of rod made the carburettors and inlet pipes. Close up the engine lacks the crispness of a white metal or resin product, but as nobody is ever going to be able to inspect it with a magnifying glass I am not too bothered. The exhaust was a large cylinder which helps to obscure one side side of the engine. A small frame was made from Evergreen strip and rigged with rolled 44 SWG copper wire - my go to material for rigging 1/72 scale biplanes.

COLORS & MARKINGS

Scratch building pusher types requires the modeller to paint many parts during the construction processes. After the nacelle had been fixed to the lower wing I painted that assembly and all the remaining flying surfaces clear doped linen. The colour of CDL varied widely according to the type of material used, the age and exposure of the linen to the elements, wear and much else. I use a mixture of approximately 5 parts Revell matt white and two parts Revell Beige (314) acrylics - the exact proportions do not matter: just experiment until you get a shade that you think is close to the real thing. I do not use under shading to show ribs etc on this scale of model as I think that the contrasts would be so small as to be almost invisible except in strong through light. The engine was painted in Revell acrylic aluminium (99), Humbrol copper enamel, and Revell acrylic black. The exhaust was painted black and then dry brushed with dark grey and rust. The engine frame and struts were painted with Revell SM 382 enamel and the wicker seats a mixture of Revell acrylic Beige and Oker (88).

FINAL CONSTRUCTION

The engine, mounted in its frame, was cemented to the rear of the nacelle. It is worth noting that the engine frame was carried above the rear of the lower wing surface. The lower boom struts were made from florists wire and epoxied into shallow grooves which had been filed into the upper rear surface of the lower wing. The lower horizontal tail surface had two small slots cut into the leading edge where the rear ends of the booms could be inserted and epoxied. The sub-assembly was supported so that it matched the plan side profile. I placed the wing on the desk and rested the tail surface on a piece of wood while the epoxy cured. The upper horizontal flying surfaces and booms were joined in the same way.

Many modellers think that assembling biplanes without a jig is almost impossible: assembling a pusher without one is impossible. I beg to differ as most pushers did not have any wing stagger: the upper wing was directly above the lower one. Having several pairs of struts is also not a problem provided they are put into place in an ordered sequence. Simple supports using Revell square acrylic paint pots and a little patience is all that was needed to assemble this model. I started by cementing the four wing struts into the lower wing around the nacelle and the two inner struts into the lower horizontal tail surface. While the cement was setting I laid the upper wing on the desk and placed small drops of cement into the holes where the wing and tail struts were to be inserted. I inverted the nacelle/wing sub-assembly and lowered the strut ends into the holes on the underside of the top wing - a small amount of adjustment with a pair of tweezers was necessary but easily accomplished. Now I placed 4 paint pots around the assembly - two to the rear of the wings and touching the booms, and two in front of the wings touching the nacelle. These held the structure and kept everything square while the cement set overnight. In the morning I could place the model right side up and insert the four outer wing struts and the outer front struts on the tail. To make sure that they were properly fixed I placed two pots of Humbrol enamel on the top wing until the cement had set. I rigged the fore-aft struts next to the nacelle and the centre of the tail, plus the front of the tail struts. This was because they were easy to reach at this stage and were less at risk of being damaged later. I now had a rigid structure into which I could add the remaining wing and tail struts, starting with the inner wing struts and working outwards, and then the tail units. I rigged the fore-aft wires between the wing struts and the rear of the wing bays, again because of ease of access. The boom struts were glued with superglue. The main undercarriage was constructed form Evergreen strip and assembled one side at a time. The axles were wire cut from a paper clip and the wheels made from discs of 60 thou card with 50 thou rod bent around a small paint brush handle and held in hot water for the tyres. The tail skids were made from similar material and assembled one side at a time. The control horns, klaxon and propellor carved from wood were fitted and the remaining rigging completed.

CONCLUSIONS

That was it - a one-off model of a one-off type which I knew nothing about until I saw a photograph on the net when researching another completely different aircraft. The joy of scratch building is that one can follow up these distractions and produce something different with a little effort and a low budget. I am interested in the early years of aviation but sadly there are very few kits of machines of this period so I have to build my own. However with a little practice there are not many parts which cannot be made and there are some good aftermarket parts which can make life a little easier along the way. Best of all the opportunities for making exotic and hardly known types is endless: give one a try.

REFERENCES

https://flyingmachines.ru/Site2/Crafts/Craft28796.htm

https://earlyaviators.com/egrahcl1.htm

https://get.google.com/albumarchive/117089293238261970588/album/AF1QipNRkeznFHR4C6x8KMajltw8vv-FfN1gusWRMT-U/AF1QipN-x93h0ATEcluzC-2rXWbO8nYZgUNSFmJRVR0D#5428495866060173746

Stephen Foster

3 February 2023

Copyright ModelingMadness.com. All rights reserved. No reproduction in part or in whole without express permission.

If you would like your product reviewed fairly and fairly quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the Note to Contributors.

Back to the Main Page

Back to the Review Index Page

Back to the Previews Index Page