Eduard 1/48 Yak-3
KIT #: | ? |
PRICE: | $ |
DECALS: | options |
REVIEWER: | Fernando Rolandelli |
NOTES: |
HISTORY |
Yak-3 “Yellow 15”, Semyon Rogovoy, 1st. Guards Air Division, Amur River, Soviet Far East, 1945.
The
concept of the “light fighter” (a machine which owes its good power/weight ratio
to a light airframe and not to a powerful engine) was extremely popular among
designers in the thirties. Most of this kind of machines (Koolhoven FK.58,
Caudron Renault C.714, Fokker D.XXI) can be regarded as failures or near
failures, while others (like the Bf 109) owed their success to the ability of
putting up weight (armour, armament, fuel) and accepting more powerful engines.
Though not strictly “light fighters”, most early Japanese designs also displayed
that typical inability to provide enough protection to the pilot and fuel system
so characteristic in this type of machines.
Perhaps the most (perhaps the only) successful light fighter of the war was the Yak-3, an aircraft with a relatively low power engine (barely exceeding 1000 hp, when most Western engines were reaching 2000 hp!) but very light (245 kg lighter than the earlier Yak-1), with a small wing area (reduced from earlier aircrafts in 2.3 sq mts) and a relatively light armament (one 20 mm cannon and two –a short initial series had only one- 12.7 machine guns, though both reputedly more powerful than similar Western weapons) and reduced fuel load. It made a very fast, agile machine (though horizontal maneuverability was reportedly about the same as the much heavier Fw 190) which was supreme as an air superiority fighter.
Rogovoy’s machine adds the interest of having served in the brief and sharply fought Russo-Japanese war of 1945. No air clashes are recorded, to my knowledge. I know, box art depicts him shooting down an Fw-190 in this very machine.
THE KIT |
The Eduard kit has been around for some time now, and it is a clean short-run type injected one. It is very simple (but so is the plane it represents) with no options save for the decals and the PE included in the Profi-pack package.
CONSTRUCTION |
The
cockpit is built up on the center wing section. Without the PE parts supplied it
would be too bare, but the real thing was very Spartan indeed. Care must be
taken when assembling the rear shelf and the glass armor. I left out the cushion
for the seat pan, as a quite un-Soviet sundry item! My kit was missing the
instrument panel acetate film, so I scrounged some instrument panel decal from
the spare box and painfully cut each single dial to match the PE panel.
Cockpit
floor and sidewalls were painted in ALG-5 metal primer, from the WEMM line. It
is a greenish light blue; I think some RLM 65 could do, perhaps with some drops
of Sky Type S.
Fuselage
and wings got assembled in one go; take care of the alignment of the upper
cowling. Mine refused to seat properly, and a thin layer of putty had to be laid
to blend the back of it. I perforated the gun troughs
and fixed some short
pieces of tubing for the gun muzzles. The dividers on the wing root openings
were added from plasticard; it was easier than it looked. Upper fuselage to wing
joins are superb and without putty they seem panel lines; the lower rear join is
hidden by the radiator housing (pretty smart design); only the front join must
be carefully blend with the Spitfire-like under nose. The rear lower fuselage,
being perfectly flat without any panel line must be also carefully puttied.
Horizontal tailplanes are absolutely fool-proof. I chose the open canopy: the
windscreen fits well, but it needs a small bed of putty to really blend into the
fuselage. The rear canopy section is smaller that the fuselage opening at the
sides, but not at the rear (which, however, needs some putty-blending); I guess
it is intentional, to allow the center section to seat on it. It seems just a
little high-riding, though, and I would recommend a vac replacement. I added the
rails from stretched sprue.
At this stage I hand painted the fuel gauges on the wings’ uppersurfaces. I covered them in Kristal Klear, then in Gloss Varnish, and then masked it with Maskol. They survived the painting and weathering process almost unscathed.
COLORS & MARKINGS |
Painting
Camouflage is in the standard Soviet late war Grays AMT-11 and -12 over AMT-7
Light Blue. I used the Soviet colours from the WEMM range; painting of models of
Soviet GPW machines is often defined as “pre-WEMM” or “WEMM” style! These
enamels are great, dry with a low sheen and have reportedly very accurate hues.
However, having stocked and scrutinized the recommended “pre-WEMM” colours (a
motley collection of paints, none of them keyed to Soviet GPW camouflage by
their manufacturers!), the final result is somewhat different and more akin to
“earlier conventional knowledge” than to the ground-breaking information once
available in the internet page (except, may be, for the AMT-7, a very bright
light blue quite unlike any other. RLM 65 –and MM “Russian Undersurface Light
Blue”! - seems very greenish in comparison, for example). However, they match
quite reasonably the colours in Pilawskii’s book, though printing colours in
paper is very tricky.
I elected
to follow the pattern in the Eduard’s instructions, which do not correspond to
the ones in the aforementioned reference. However, a picture showing this very
airframe behind some pilots (its owner included) shows the port nose depicted
the very characteristic “x-shaped” feature, so I included it in the pattern.
Though variances occurred, thinking it over I would recommend discarding the
instructions completely and going for one of the patterns in the book, not only
in modeling this particular airframe but any of the other options in the box.
Decals
After a gloss coat, decals were applied. They are rather stiff, especially the yellow motifs, due to the white backing they have to ensure undersurface colors do not bleed. They are also sticky, and moving them around is difficult. I cut the fuselage star from the shield and slogan, but it was not a good idea in the end. Some random silvering couldn’t be prevented from occurring. Very strangely, the well-known Boris Jerjomin plane is only depicted in the standard boxing (there exists a picture showing Mr. Ferepont Golovaty, the donor of the aircraft, in the act of handing it over to Jerjomin; what about private initiative in Soviet Russia?).
FINAL CONSTRUCTION |
Basically, it involves fitting the undercarriage and propeller. The later,
though a “separate blades” affair, as cherished by Czech
model makers as dreaded
by modelers, is very simple and sturdy. Not the former, quite fragile and
complex. The main legs, though lacking any proper means of being attached, are
almost self aligning if left to their own devices. The arms of the pistons on
the well roof are too long; the inner braces do not reach the main leg. I cut
the arms, and lengthened the braces. Once everything is glued, it forms a quite
strong structure. The PE braces for the auxiliary doors are very fragile and
tricky to assemble, but so were the originals (meant to close the doors when
pushed by the retracting wheels; they were frequently damaged if the pilot did
not remember to touch the brakes to stop the wheels spinning within the
retracting cycle) Both wheel wells and struts were painted AMT-7; so were the
wheel centers, after searching in vain through pictures to find one which
allowed it to be painted a contrasting color (Tractor Green?) The resin
flattened wheels were used; at first sight they seem exaggerated, but once
fitted, they are not. I fitted the exhausts and the “Red soldiers”, as well as
the canopy hood (I shall probably replace it with a vac if I manage to get one)
and the antennae wire.
CONCLUSIONS |
Nice and relaxed building. The model looks the part, and Soviet art and heraldry from the GPW is very colorful, “heroic-looking” and so distinct from Western forms of art that any such a model is very interesting visually. I would heartily recommend the Profi-Pack variant of the kit; as for very little more money you get the PE parts which really dress the cockpit, without any fussy useless bits (the plain kit combined to the Eduard separated PE set is more expensive and it comes with the overly complex “flaps-down” assembly; I have yet to find a picture of a Yak of any subtype parked in that attitude)
REFERENCES |
- “Soviet Air Force Fighter Colours 1941-1945”, Erik Pilawskii, Classic Colours.
- “Yakovlev’s Piston-Engined Fighters”, Yefim Gordon and Dmitriy Khazanov, Midland Publishing.
- “Modeling the VVS aircraft” website
July 2006
If you would like your product reviewed fairly and fairly quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the Note to Contributors.