KIT #: | AA 2041 |
PRICE: | $60.00 direct |
DECALS: | One option |
REVIEWER: | Peter Burstow |
NOTES: | Resin kit with vac canopy |
HISTORY |
The Hughes XF-11 was an unsuccessful reconnaissance aircraft, only two were
built, the remaining 98 on order were cancelled. The first prototype crashed on
it's maiden flight, on 7th July 1946, badly injuring pilot Howard Hughes. The
second prototype first flew on 5th April 1947 but was rejected by the United
States Air Force after testing, as was the competing Republic XF-12 Rainbow.
A model of the aircraft, supposedly of the first prototype, but actually quite different, appeared in the movie “The Aviator”. There is a lot of further history available online, including a few photographs and a newsreel of the crash scene.
THE KIT |
The decal sheet has four 'stars and bars' with separate red lines, and two pairs
of serial numbers. The serial decals for the first prototype, 44-70155, are
missing the '1'. The second serial number supplied is 45-54593, not sure what
it's for, the second prototype was 44-70156.
The parts are cleanly cast with engraved detail. There are pouring blocks and
some flash to clean up. A first examination found plenty of moulding glitches
and bubbles. There is a little cockpit detail, some framing detail in the wheel
wells, but no engine detail, just a blank plate.
The instructions are a single sheet, with a short history, parts list, and an
exploded diagram. There is a single picture of the proposed, earlier XA-37
concept, and a three view drawing with painting and decalling information. The
instructions are barely adequate for assembly, extra references will be needed.
CONSTRUCTION |
Just to
be different, I started construction with the three piece wing. A clean up of
the mating surfaces was the only preparation needed. Fit wasn't too bad, with
both joints needing a bit of filling with superglue and sanding. Only the upper
surface joint needs cleaning up, the lower joint is hidden by the booms.
I gave
the fuselage pod and wing a shot of primer, to check the seams. Superglue is a
great filler, but it's almost impossible to see. A bit more sanding and filling
was needed on all the seams, and some glitches and bubbles, using Tamiya basic
filler and Mr Surfacer to finish off.
Next to build was the two booms, the usual sanding of the mating surfaces, then
joined. Fit was not good, with a seam down the centreline of each boom. More
filling and sanding. These seams gave me a lot of trouble, despite superglue and
clamping, they kept opening up. I clamped them closed and gave them a soak in
very hot water, to try and get a bit of the tension out of the slightly warped
boom halves. Gave the booms a prime, and they needed a bit more filling and
sanding.
The only remaining sub assembly was the propellers and spinners. Some time was
spent sorting through the blades to find the the correct ones for the first
prototype, the Hamilton-Standard props at 15'1” diameter front, and 15'3” rear,
were a little longer and narrower than the Curtiss-Electric prop at 14'8”, not a
lot of difference at 1/72 scale. There didn't seem to be any difference in the
blades at all, so I picked the ones with the fewest bubbles or glitches. The
instructions were no help in determining the pitch or rotation direction, but I
found a good photo showing the forward blades rotating clockwise. All the usual
dramas getting the blades right. They had a pin and socket attachment which made
things a lot easier then the usual butt joint.
Finally time to get the airframe together. The main trick was getting it all
square. I had to do a little sanding of the sockets in the tops of the booms to
get the wing to fit better. It was a bit of a juggle getting the tailplane into
position at the same time as the booms, locating pins on the tailplane helped
hold it together. Then more fun, the boom seams began to open up, sort of lost
track about how often this happened, but each part of the seam split open at
least once, usually just after I had carefully filled and sanded it. Then the
large fins were added, and more seams to deal with. As I was filling the seam on
the starboard fin, the top of the boom opened again. More superglue and sanding.
Then as I sanded the port fin joint, the boom seam opened again.
I was
getting a bit tired of these seams by this point, I had tried three different
types of superglue, and had firmly clamped them, not sure what was going on, but
anything more than the most gentle handling resulted in the distinctive crack of
the seam splitting. Each time needed a clean up of the joint to remove the old
glue, a wash, then a sit and dry for a day in the sun.
Eventually I noticed that the tail-plane was slightly warped, about 0.5 mm low
in the middle, and that was enough to provide a twist to the booms. I cut the
tailplane off, and got rid of the warp using boiling water, then re-assembled.
By filling the lower port boom joint at it's open position, instead of clamping
it closed, I relieved the stress, and no more splitting;
I hope.
Gave the kit another shot of primer, and found a few more repairs to do. The
problem with all this sanding is that bubbles keep appearing. Another fill and
sand session and I was done.
On to the cockpit, added the pilot's and observer's seats, instrument panel,
control column, periscope and a radio box. It all looked a little bare, and very
visible under the large canopy so I added brass harnesses from the spares box.
Painted the interior green, then painted some details in a variety of colours to
make it look a bit busy. Then I used a foam mask to block off the cockpit well.
Then the u/c legs were added, finally got to see if it was going to tail sit, it
was marginal, just nose sitting until my dog walked past, so I filled the well
beside the seats with more lead shot. Next step was to add the undercarriage
doors, these came in the closed position and needed splitting to display open,
and a light clean up around the edges. Sprayed the undercarriage wells Tamiya
AS-12 'Bare Metal silver' but had no information on what colour it should be.
Then masked off the wells.
COLORS & MARKINGS |
Finally ready for a final spray. I used Tamiya AS-16 light grey from a rattle
can. The semi-gloss paint showed up a few more seams and bubbles that needed
more work, another dose of Mr Surfacer, 1200 type this time, then another sand
and wash session. Another coat of AS-16 and I was happy. I then gave the model
an overall
spray with floor polish. I use a cheap external mix air brush for this, nice
even coat, with no bubbles or runs.
Hand painted the anti-dazzle strip to the nose, the instructions show more
anti-dazzle patches on the inside of the cowlings, but these did not appear in
the photos of the first prototype, so I left them off.
Added the vacformed cockpit. It wasn't very clear, with poorly defined framing
lines. Did the one prominent frame with decal stripe.
The supplied decals worked fine, but very slow, and didn't conform to the panel
lines. I used micro set to fix them, but found that micro soft didn't seem to do
anything, three applications of Mr. Mark Softer did the trick. I used a bit of
Xtradecal strip to add the extra '1'.
Added the radar antenna to the nose, then attached the vac-formed nose cone.
Gave the model another spray with polish, then added the wheels and propellers.
CONCLUSIONS |
A
surprisingly big and impressive model, I was kind of expecting something the
size of a P-61. With a span of over 100 feet, it's more the size of a four
engined bomber.
Like most resin kits, assembly was quick and easy, but all seams needed a lot of
work to get right. The seam splitting issue took a week or two to sort out, but
after that things went OK. The separate bladed propellers were a bit of a pain.
Recommended for anybody with a few resin kits already done, plenty of swing room
on the bench and who don't mind a lot of seam working.
REFERENCES |
Bill Yenne, 'The World's Worst Aircraft', Bison Books, London, 1990.
Mike Machat, 'World's Fastest Four-engined Piston-Powered Aircraft',
Specialty Press, North Branch MN, 2011.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hughes_XF-11
Kit Instructions.
January 2015
If you would like your product reviewed fairly and fairly quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the Note to Contributors.