MYK Design 72065: A6M5 'Carrier Based Aircraft'

SHEET #: 72065
PRICE: 800 yen

MYK Design is a company in Hiroshima. The first two initials are those of the owner. I recently discovered a few of their 1/72 scale sheets on eBay and ordered two. The package that arrived included a long list of their products, all written in Japanese (which I can read). Over half of their offerings are for 1/144 aircraft!

I have not wetted any of their decals and do not know how they perform.

This sheet includes both white numerals for tail markings and black numerals for landing gear doors. Time will tell whether the white ink turns yellow. Unfortunately, there aren’t any tiny white numerals for the front of the cowling. The numerals are good facsimiles of wartime markings.

This sheet throws the modeler into the deep end of carrier plane tail markings for the first half of 1944. The few photos that have been published show something less than a consistent scheme. Although it is tempting to think that a Japanese decal maker may have special insight into the matter, MYK has not provided any written support for its choices, and I suspect that at least half are speculative. Mr. M. Y. does not identify the one unit denoted by codes “301”, “302” and “303”, which are among those provided. (He may believe them to be for Number 601 Kaigun Kōkūtai for some part of the period February 1944-June 1944. However, a Japanese reference tells us that codes for that unit were 311, 312 and 313.)

One set of markings is basically a re-pop of what is in the Tamiya 1/72 plain Model Five Two kit: 3 over 320-85. A photo of 3 over 320-85 (all numerals apparently in white, and the 3s are flattop) was published in 2005 in Tatakau UmiwashiTaiintachi no Shashinshū by Yōji Watanabe. It shows a Model 52 on the deck of Junyō. The photo came as a surprise to Japanese naval aircraft buffs. The “0” is apparently a refusal to identify a mother ship. The aircraft unit is Number 652 Kaigun Kōkūtai, which was intended, at times, to be based on three carriers simultaneously, Junyō, Hiyō and Ryūhō. The “0” unit code may have been a sort of wild card suitable for all three carriers. (Number 652 Kaigun Kōkūtai was a large composite unit that was established on paper on 10 March 1944. At first, it was land-based and terribly under-strength as to aircraft inventory and training. The plan was that it would move onto the three aircraft carriers when enough aircraft were delivered and enough pilots were checked out for carrier landings. It was placed into Number 2 Kōkū Sentai, as indicated by the “2” in “320”. Suffering heavy losses in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, it was disbanded on 10 July 1944. The fate of 3 over 320-85 is unclear. My theory is that it was not necessarily closely associated with Junyō. It may have been one of a small number of fighters held in reserve by the kōkūtai, and possibly not counted as part of any particular carrier’s complement.)

On the same sheet MYK has rendered “321-15” as another Junyō plane for exactly the same month in which it places 3 over 320-85, March 1944! This is the sort of thing that confuses modelers. It is conceivable that both 3 over 320-85 and 321-15 were contemporaneous and associated with Junyō in some way, but MYK does not give any guidance.

Another surprise from the photo of 3 over 320-85 was the use of the single digit above the unit code and airplane number. It was not a common practice in 1944 and should not be extrapolated to many other models. (Incidentally, a high airplane number like 85 may have been assigned for planes on the third carrier of Number 2 Kōkū Sentai, Ryūhō, even though the photo was taken on Junyō. Junyō’s flight deck was approximately 80 feet longer than Ryūhō’s at the time and may have been deemed more suitable for training.)

Oddly, MYK has chosen to use flattop 3s only for the one plane; the seven other tail markings have round-top 3s. In the first half of 1944, the round-top 3 was not so predominant. Also, MYK’s color choice of white tends to place these tail markings in the first quarter of 1944 or earlier, making them largely useless for the Battle of the Philippine Sea. For that battle, carrier plane tail codes were yellow.

The sheet includes hinomaru for one plane, with a few extra disks. In my next review here, I will comment on the dark red ink that MYK has chosen for hinomaru.


IJN Ryūhō: Tabular Record of Movement, Anthony Tully, 2001,

Japanese Naval Air Force Camouflage and Markings World War II, Donald W. Thorpe, Aero Publishers, Inc., 1977.

Japanese Naval Air Force Fighter Units and Their Aces 1932-1945, Ikuhiko Hata, Yasuho Izawa and Christopher Shores, Grub Street, 2011.

Sekai no Kessaku Ki (aka Famous Airplanes of the World) No. 9, Bunrindō, 1988, 1993 reprint.

Tatakau UmiwashiTaiintachi no Shashinshū, Yōji Watanabe, Bungeishunjū (2005).

Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869-1945, Hansgeorg Jentschura, Dieter Jung and Peter Mickel, U.S. Naval Institute, 1982.

Tom Hall

April 2018


If you would like your product reviewed fairly and fairly quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the Note to Contributors.