Monogram 1/48 F-105F Thunderchief

KIT #

5806

PRICE:

$8.00 (in 1982)

DECALS:

See Review

REVIEW:
PHOTOS :

Blair Stewart
Jim Harmon

NOTES:

F-105G kit modified to F-105F

HISTORY

Thud, Thunderthud, Hog, Lead Sled, Squat Bomber ­ all affectionate terms given by its pilots to Republic Aviationıs F-105 Thunderchief. The F-105 evolved from a project begun in 1951 by Republic Aviation to develop a supersonic tactical fighter-bomber to replace the F-84F. The prototype first flew on October 22, 1955, but the first production aircraft, an F-105B, was not delivered to the USAF until 1958. The F-105D all-weather strike fighter and the two-place F-105F dual-purpose trainer-fighter also were built before F-105 production ended in 1964 at 833 aircraft. No "C" or "E" series were produced, The 143 F-105Fs were converted from the last F-105Ds that were produced. The F-105G came from a modification to fifty F-105Fs that incorporated fuselage-mounted ECM blisters.

Although originally designed as a supersonic nuclear weapon delivery platform, the F105 distinguished itself in a tactical bombing role during the Vietnam conflict. First sent to Southeast Asia in early 1965, the Thunderchief became the USAF workhorse in delivering ordinance to targets in North Vietnam, termed by many veteran pilots to have even more concentrated air defenses than those that defended Nazi Germany during World War II. Through 1969, F-105s carried out about 75% of all the air strikes launched against North Vietnam. At the same time, the losses were significant: by the end of May 1967 225 F-105s had been lost over North Vietnam.

Due to the North Vietnameseıs use of the Soviet SA-2 surface-to-air missile or "SAM", the Air Force began looking for ways to counter this new threat. The result was the Wild Weasel Program, a specially equipped two-seat fighter that could detect SA-2 acquisition radars and then attack or divert (suppress) the SAM batteries. The mission of Wild Weasels was to fly ahead of a strike force into the target area, entice enemy SAMs and antiaircraft radars to come on the air, and then knock them out with bombs or with missiles that homed on the radar's emissions. Weasels were often in a high-threat area for a long time while the strike force attacked its targets and withdrew. The Weaselsı mission of offering themselves as targets for enemy antiaircraft batteries was made even more hazardous by the presence of MIG fighters in the target areas.

The first aircraft used in this role were F-100Fs carrying a variety of "dumb" ordinance and relatively crude radar detection systems. Later, these early Weasels were equipped with the Navy-developed AGM-45 Shrike anti-radiation missile or "ARM." These missiles could be fired from an aircraft and  would home in on an emitting radar signal.

It was soon apparent that a higher performance aircraft than the F-100F was needed for Weasel missions, so the F-105F was pressed into service. This represented a great leap in the effectiveness of Wild Weasels. The F-105F could match the speed of the strike force F-105Ds, thus allowing the force to enter the combat area at a higher rate of speed. In addition, the F-105F could carry much more ordinance for neutralizing SAM sites (some 14,000 pounds of ordinance. To put this in perspective, the WWII B-17 normally carried a bomb load of about 6,000 pounds!).  More importantly, pilots who flew the 105 knew that if they got in trouble, they could head for the weeds, hit the afterburner, and watch the enemy disappear in the rearview mirror. NOTHING could stay with a Thud on the deck!  

THE KIT


Since my senior year at the Air Force Academy, I have had an admiring affection for the Thunderchief. 1968 happened to be the year a flight of four F-105Ds was performing a low altitude flyby at the Academy to commemorate the dedication of a Thud as a new static display on the Academyıs terrazzo. The dignitaries included the Air Force Chief of Staff, a variety of F105 Wing Commanders, and the man himself: Republic Aviationıs Alexander Kartveli, the Thudıs chief designer. After a normal four-ship flyby, the aircraft circled around for another pass.  This time, the aircraft were in trail formation and about as low as you could go without clipping the top of the flagpole. As I was marching to the noon meal with the rest of the Cadet Wing, I remember looking up and realizing that I could not hear the lead aircraft. Shortly after uttering an "oh sugar" or something to that effect, there was a loud bang, and, you guessed it, tons of damage. We entered the dining hall, and virtually every window pane on the southside of Mitchell Hall had been blown out by the sonic boom! The same results happened for part of the dormitory and the gym, all of which were in the flight path. Fortunately, no one was seriously hurt by the incident. The flight leader was grounded while the Air Force investigated the incident (we all said he had to be a USAFA Grad to do that!), and I believe the official answer from the inquiry was that,  given the atmospheric conditions at the time and the altitude of the Academy, the flight in its attempt to make a good impression accidentally exceeded the speed of sound.  Needless to say, the event made quite an impression on a bunch of young guys who couldnıt wait to start flying airplanes for a living (and even on those of us who were blind as a bat in both eyes but still loved airplanes!).

The Monogram F-105G kit was released in 1982, before the release of their F-105D kit (No. 5812, released in 1985). Monogram also released an F-105F kit (No. 5808, which was subsequently released as kit No. 5816 as part of the "Call to Glory" series). I chose the G kit primarily because it provided the Wild Weasel Shrike missiles and the 600 gallon centerline fuel tank, which are not in the F kit (that kit provides a multiple ejection rack for the centerline station and two 600 gallon wing drop tanks). The G kit also comes with one AGM-78 Standard ARM and a 600 gallon wing tank that allows accurate modeling of the so-called "asymmetrical load" of two Shrikes on the outboard wing stations, a Standard ARM on one inboard wing station, a 600 gallon fuel tank on the other inboard station, and a centerline fuel tank, which was typical of G Weasel missions in the 1968-69 time period. To construct a reasonably accurate F-105F from the G kit, simply leave off the two long QRC-380 ECM blisters that mount on the fuselage sides below each wing, and change the ordinance load around a bit (more on this later).

The kit is typical for its time: raised panel lines, but overall an outstanding kit. The parts are molded in an olive green styrene on four trees. A single tree is also included for the clear parts. Also typical for the time, the kit decals are somewhat sparse.

With the exception of the side-mounted APR-25 OMNI antennas, I think all of the F-105F and G ECM antennas and fairings are either molded onto the modelıs fuselage or provided as separate parts. These antennas include the four IR-133 APR-25 (or APR-35 for the F-105G) direction finding and homing antennas on the nose, the APR 26 blade antennas on the bottom of the fuselage, and the radar homing and warning (RHAW) fairings and APR-25/26 aft antennas on the vertical stabilizer. The ALR-31 wing tip antennas are also included, and the modeling purest will have to remove these for an accurate F-105F (given my lazy nature and the fact that I donıt compete in contests, I chose to ignore this modification ­ things like this happen when youıre over fifty and realize you have hundreds of kits to build and not too many fruitful modeling years left to accomplish that ominous task!).

I have read some reviews of this kit that criticize the lack of interior detail, but for a guy like me who builds "box-stock" I found it to be a fairly good representation of the real thing when compared to actual cockpit photos. Those interested in adding more detail can check out the Black Box F-105G Thunderchief Cockpit Detail Set (No. 48015). Other detailists might want to replace the pitot tube with a needle or some other better representation, but otherwise, the kit is just fine. Hasegawaıs weapon sets can also be used for various ordinance loads, although the ordinance and fuel tanks that come with the kit are adequate in my opinion.

CONSTRUCTION

Construction of the kit was relatively straightforward. With the exception of the radome, I had zero fit problems, and the general outline and shape of the model accurately portray the prototype.
I chose to assemble, paint and decal this model in subassemblies, which is not a normal modeling practice for me. Given the complexity of the camouflage scheme, this worked very well and I intend to try it on future kits.

I started with the cockpit tub and assembled it per the kit instructions. The tub was painted overall Model Masters medium gray with black instrument panels and boxes. Instruments were highlighted by drybrushing the kitıs raised instrument panel details with flat white. Various knobs and switches were highlighted in flat red and yellow paints.
The cockpit tub fits well in the fuselage. No nose weight is required to make the model sit on its tricycle gear, as the wing landing gear, just like on the prototype, are located well behind the middle of the fuselage.
The one area of caution in the entire assembly process is the landing gear: just like on the real thing, it is quite spindly, and if you are not careful in aligning the gear during assembly, you are apt to get a bowed look in the gear (this happened to me on my first F-105D kit when I built it almost 15 years ago, and it has bothered me greatly ever since (but not enough to take the time to fix it!).  Prior to their installation, I slightly flattened the tires with an Exacto knife to give them that squashed look.

For under wing stores, I decided to model a typical Wild Weasel mission of the pre-F105G period: one Shrike missile and an ALQ-87 ECM pod on the outboard pylons, single CBU bombs on the inboard pylons, and a 600 gallon centerline fuel tank. The CBU bombs came from the Hasegawa Weapons Set A. I scrounged the ECM pod from an old Monogram F-4C kit  (No. 5800) that was in my spare parts box.

After completing the major subassemblies, I glued the wings and horizontal stabilizers onto the fuselage. Detail parts such as the underwing stores, the various blade antennas under the fuselage, the tail hook, and the engine-mounted speed brakes were then added. The top three brakes were glued in a slightly open position with the bottom one fully extended as per the normal configuration for Thuds on the ground.  The canopies and front windscreen were then added. The interiors of the canopy frames were painted flat black.

 


PAINT & DECALS


The first task was to choose the paint for this model. Here, as far as I am concerned, there is no choice: Floquil Classic Military colors. Floquil has the best representation of the Vietnam color scheme Iıve seen. Unfortunately, they have been purchased by Testors, and the Floquil military colors are being discontinued. Testors claims their FSN enamel paints are the same, but the jury is still out on that one in this modelerıs household.  There was an old rumor going around that the reason Floquilıs paint matched the USAF Vietnam camouflage colors so well is that they supplied the actual paint that was applied to the real aircraft. After contacting Floquil and asking if this were true, I was told that the rumor probably got started because Floquil  began as a contract supplier of the US government providing paint and a "paint like pen;" hence, the term "Flo-quil". The US Navy used Floquil products to mark deck cargo. After WWII, Floquil continued to provide paint (and markers) to the US armed forces, though not for final use (at least to the best of the remaining people at Floquilıs knowledge) on military equipment.

Floquil recognized hobbyists might need paint to complete replicas of military equipment. Floquil did have US government paint specifications as a supplier of paint to the US Government, so they made model paint conforming to US standards. And there you have it! (Itıs amazing what you can find out these days using the Internet).

Fortunately, my local hobby shop still had a supply of Floquil FS34079 (Dark Green), FS34102 (Medium Green), FS30219 (Tan), and FS36622 (Light Gray), so I grabbed them up. Normally, I freehand airbrush my aircraft and armor camouflage patterns, but the Thud had a distinctive pattern that was pretty much standard for all of the 105s used in Southeast Asia, so I decided once again to try something a little different (See: you CAN teach an old dog new tricks!). After reading a recent Finescale Modeler article by Darren Roberts on masking and painting complex camouflage schemes, I decided to give this a go.

After attaching the windscreen and the canopies with white glue, I sprayed the entire model with FS36622 light gray. Any flaws were cleaned up and resprayed. Then I attacked the paint scheme on the upper surfaces.  First, I took the kit instruction sheet, which had a pretty good representation of the Thudıs camo scheme, and enlarged it to 1/48 scale on a copier. I then cut out patterns for the tri-color scheme for the wings, fuselage, vertical stabilizer, and horizontal stabilizers.  I began by spraying the first color, dark green, in the general locations that it appears in the aircraftıs camo scheme. The areas that would actually be painted in dark green were then masked using the cutout patterns, which were attached to the model using Scotch Removable Magic Tape (this is a low tack tape, that, with some care, can be removed without ripping up your paint scheme).  I then sprayed the next color (medium green), and proceeded to mask where those areas would be as with the first color. This process continued until the paint job was finished.

I applied a coat of Future in preparation for the decals. I decided to use aftermarket decals, so I chose AeroMasterıs sheet No. 48-374, "Takhli Weasels." I selected aircraft no. 63-8311, "Sam Fighter" from that sheet as the one I wanted to model. The decals went on effortlessly, and after they dried I coated them and the entire model with Testors Dullcoat.

Final touches included red "remove before flight" tags from a P.P. Aeroparts Acessories Sheet (No. RBF002).  These were attached to the ordinance as well as each seat. I also added a boarding ladder and a pilotıs helmet on the front windscreen. The pilotıs helmet was made by cutting off the head of the kitıs pilot figure and drilling out the inside of the helmet using a Dremel tool, then further reaming it with an Exacto knife. I painted the helmet red and applied some very small star decals to represent a flight helmet that was typical of those worn by USAF pilots during the Vietnam War.  

CONCLUSIONS

This is my second Monogram Thud, and I intend to build more of them. Monogram-Revell has re-released their 1/48th scale F-105D as kit No. 5840, so I picked up another one to add to my collection (perhaps they have plans to re-issue the G or F). The model builds into a great replica of the prototype and is worth the minimal effort required to construct it.  This kit is highly recommended to all those that want to recreate one of the most  impressive airplanes to ever serve with the USAF. (A final note: I dedicate this article with admiration and respect to all former Weasel drivers, and especially those that didnıt make it back from Southeast Asia. We thank all of you for your courage under fire and devotion to duty).

REFERENCES


1.
Archer, Robert D., "The Republic F-105 Thunderchief," Aero Publishers, Inc., 1969.
2. Berger, Carl, "The United States Air Force In Southeast Asia: 1961-1973," Government Printing Office, 1977
3. Davis, Larry, Wild Weasel: The SAM Suppression Story," Squadron/Signal Publications, 1986.
4. Drendel, Lou, "F-105 Thunderchief in Action," Squadron/Signal Publications, 1974.
5. Drendel, Lou, "Air War Over Southeast Asia: A Pictorial Record, Vol. 2, 1967-1970," Squadron/Signal Publications, 1983.
6. Kinzey, Bert, "F-105 Thunderchief in Detail and Scale," Aero Publishers, Inc., 1982.
7. Nuebeck, Ken, "Walk Around: F-105 Thunderchief," Squadron/Signal Publications, 2000.
8. Roberts, Darren, "Camouflage This Adversary Hornet: Using Layered Masking to Paint a Difficult Scheme," Finescale Modeler Magazine, March 2001.

Blair Stewart

If you would like your product reviewed fairly and quickly, please contact me or see other details in the Note to Contributors.

Back to Main Page

Back to Reviews Page