Hasegawa 1/48 F-18C Hornet
KIT #: | 9327 |
PRICE: | $16.98 |
DECALS: | One option |
REVIEWER: | Dale Rannals |
NOTES: |
HISTORY |
A blurb form
Wikipedia: The
McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) F/A-18
Hornet is a supersonic, all-weather carrier-capable multirole fighter
jet, designed to attack both ground and aerial targets. The F/A-18 was derived
from the YF-17 in the 1970s for use by the United States Navy and Marine Corps.
The Hornet is also used by the air forces of several other nations. It has been
the aerial
demonstration aircraft for the U.S. Navy's Flight Demonstration Squadron, the
Blue Angels, since 1986.
The fighter's primary missions are fighter escort, fleet air defense,
suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), air interdiction, close air support
and Aerial reconnaissance. Its versatility and reliability have proven it to be
a valuable carrier asset, though it has been criticized for its lack of range
and payload compared to its earlier contemporaries, such as the F-14 Tomcat in
the fighter and strike fighter role, and the A-6 Intruder and A-7 Corsair II in
the attack role.
THE KIT |
This version of Hasegawa’s
Hornet comes in a big box. The outside is adorned with a very nice picture of a
VFA-115 “Eagles” bird. The inside
is similarly decked out with gray plastic….lots of it.
Parts count here is somewhere around 220 pieces, running
the full
gamut between large and itty-bitty, all with very nice engraved detail and no
flash exhibited. One sprue of clear
plastic, the canopy and various lights and lenses, round out the plastic bits.
Also included is a small fret of Photo-etch parts and some nice metal
landing gear. Of course, and
unfortunately typical of Hasegawa, the kit has no weapons.
http://modelingmadness.com/reviews/mod/Krausef18c.htm
CONSTRUCTION |
Construction started with me
looking thru all the sprues with amazement.
Lots of parts here and I was curious at the “how and why” aspect of the
kits engineering. Looking over the
sheer parts count here and looking at the Monogram Hornet I had bought for my
son showed two distinct philosophies.
The Monogram Bug is a simpler build with less detail and less finesse
(and of course less parts) while the Hasegawa offering gives all that and the
options of dropped slats and flaps, which alone accounts for a considerable
number of those parts. I’m sure
there are those “Experts” out there who would argue the fact, but I’m sure you
can make a fine example of this fighter from either source….it’s just all about
what you want from the build. Want
one definitive Bug in your collection?
The Hasagawa’s path will fill the bill.
Want a fleet of bugs in different markings?
I’m sure the Monogram offering would suffice just fine (and your
pocketbook would be much happier at that!!).
Whichever route you take, you can get there from here….just enjoy the
journey either way.
Alright….I
started the build by familiarizing myself with the instructions and deciding
what options I wanted. For me it
was going to be flaps and slats down, canopy and airbrake closed. I then set
about trying to minimize that parts count, i.e., gluing together any
subassemblies I could. Fuel tanks,
pylons, slats, flaps, wheels, etc. where
dutifully joined and set aside. I
also removed the parts I wasn’t going to use from the sprues and threw them in a
Ziploc bag to minimize confusion down the line.
The cockpit assembly was
next; first on the instructions…go figure. The cockpit tub is for a two-seater,
but parts are only added to front.
The rear half is eventually covered up by a fuselage insert/cover giving you…abra-cadabra…a
single seat fighter. Don’t be
confused…it’s just Hasegawa getting the most out of their molds.
The front office, out of the box, is quite acceptable, but I’m sure there
are enough aftermarket bits for those who want to super-detail.
The flaps are a nice
feature, and a tedious assembly.
All I can say here is take your time.
There are 8 separate hinges for the flaps.
I glued the hinges to the wings, and after they had set up for a few
minutes, I positioned the flaps to the hinges to make sure they lined up
properly, making adjustments as necessary.
After they had dried for a day I glued the flaps onto the hinges without
difficulty.
The metal
landing gear is nicely done. The
front is a fairly complex assembly of about a dozen parts; the rear is quite
simple at 5. Truthfully though, I
do not understand the inclusion of these metal bits.
It doesn’t up the detail from what can be done with plastic, and the
Hornet isn’t such a large aircraft where the weight of the model would be a
factor. I guess I just see it as
something that would raise the price of an already expensive kit.
YMMV.
The kit supplies targeting
pods(?) for the fuselage sparrow stations but for the life of me I could not get
the fairings to mate up at all without leaving huge gaps.
I left them off. Behind the
canopy there are two bumps on the fuselage, depicted separately in the kit by
two tiny parts, K23. Well, of
course, in the process of trying to get these off the sprue and on the plane,
one of them escaped, never to be seen again.
Bummer. There were no extras
on the sprues and nothing similar in the spares bin, so I cut and sanded a piece
of sprue to a similar shape. Good
enough.
I found the PE fret to be
practically useless. The HUD pieces
were cool, but my attempt to bend these into shape resulted in a couple very
tiny, very mangled bits of metal. Besides those and the parts for the boarding
ladder, which I didn’t use anyway, the photo etch parts don’t add much to the
detail. Again, I just see it as a
price increaser. Can we have some
weapons instead maybe? Anyone?
Anyone?
COLORS & MARKINGS |
Ahhh….Dark
Ghost Gray and Light Ghost Gray; looking thru my stash of paints I discover that
I have neither. Okay, fine, off to
the local hobby shop I go….I needed some other supplies anyway.
Sure enough, they don’t have any Light Ghost Gray.
Hmmmmmmm…okay again; when I mix up the DGG, lightened for scale effect
and thinned for the airbrush, I’ll lighten a portion of it for the bottom color.
And this is what I did. Only
problem is that I didn’t lighten it quite enough and so the two colors appear as
one from anything more than a foot away.
Still, many of the Hornet pics I’ve seen exhibit
this same quality, so I left it be.
I went back over both colors with lighter and darker mixes to highlight/weather
panels and panel lines, respectively.
I kept this to a minimum as I figure a CAG bird would be kept in pretty
good shape. I then masked off and
painted the fins Dark Sea Blue and dipped the radome in a small jar of some tan
I had mixed up for, well….something.
After all this dried for a few days a gloss coat of Future was applied to
prep for decals. The Superscale
decals went on without a hitch…..easy to apply, easy to position, and snuggled
down nicely. Back to the spray
booth for a final clear flat coat.
Then a strange thing
happened. When I removed the Tamiya tape
mask from the canopy, I it left behind an odd residue…almost like the tape
reacted with the clear coat of Future I gave it weeks earlier.
I tried rubbing it off with a fingernail and then a toothpick, but no
luck. I finally removed the canopy
and lightly wet sanded the blemishes off.
Then I spent some time at the sink, polishing the canopy with some
toothpaste on a finger, rinsing and reapplying often. Then a re-dip in Future
and all was well again. I can’t
explain what this was or why it happened, but I was just happy it was fixable.
It was glued back in place.
On went the fiddly
bits…landing gear and wheels, teeny tiny antenna, pylons and fuel tanks.
I also added two AMRAAM missiles I had left over from a Eurofighter kit.
These went on the outboard pylon.
Hasegawa gives a nice chart as to what weapons can go where. (Nice of
them even though there is nary a weapon in the box.)
Afterwards while looking at Hornet pics on the web I noticed there should
be an adapter between the missile and pylon.
Oh well, it still looks better than bare; more like a fighter and less
like a fuel delivery truck.
And at that she was done.
CONCLUSIONS |
I
am usually not a fast jet guy. My
normal builds usually have a prop or two or four hanging off them.
So when Scott offered this kit for a review, I though why not, it would
be something different. I’m glad I
did. Though I’m not a big fan of
the Hornet, this is a
mighty
impressive kit. Big box, large
parts count, awesome detail. The
dropped flaps/slats option is a very nice feature…..and they are not an easy
feature to replicate.
But come on Hasegawa, what’s with the no weapons thing?
When the other manufacturers can come up with kits at half the price and
a full weapons outfit with spares left over, I just don’t get it.
How about leaving out the metal landing gear and practically useless PE
fret and give us a sprue of weapons?
Nobody should have to pay the asking price and then shell out more for a
weapons set. This is one of the nicest kit I’ve done in a long time, and one
that I am probably the most critical of.
Hasegawa has recently lost their US distributor for some reason.
I will shed nary a tear.
Now, after that rant, I do need to state that I wholeheartedly recommend
this kit to all Hornet fans out there.
It builds up to a most impressive quarter scale Bug.
Just buy one when you find a sale!
REFERENCES |
The Internet
Kit and decals courtesy of Scott Van Aken and Modeling Madness.
May 2010
If you would like your product reviewed fairly and quickly, please contact me or see other details in the Note to Contributors.