Revell 1/48 Me-410B-2/U-4
KIT #:  
DECALS: Two options
REVIEWER: Tom Cleaver
NOTES: Kit is not currently in production but can be found.


          The Messeschmitt Me-410 was essentially a redesigned Me-210, with a lengthened fuselage and DB603 engines rather than the DB605 of the earlier design.  This redesign solved the problems of the Me-210, which were so difficult that it was deemed prudent to give the redesigned modification a new designation number to remove all connection with the previous failure.

          The Me-410A Schnellbomber appeared in late 1942, and proved an elusive target when used for night bombing missions over England in 1943.  The Me-410B Zerstorer appeared on operations in 1943, and proved successful when attacking unescorted American daylight bomber formations during the summer and fall of 1943.  The airplane was no match for P-38s, P-47s or P-51s as these escorts began appearing with sufficient range to escort the bombers all the way to and from the target.  On March 6, 1944, during the first daylight raid on Berlin, Me-410s of ZG 76 shot down 8 B-17s, while losing 16 of their own force in return.  By the late spring of 1944, the vulnerable Me-410s had been removed from operations despite being Hitlerís favorite bomber destroyers.

          The Me-410B-2/U4 used the 50mm Bordkanone series weapon, the BK‑5 with 22 rounds (21 rounds to be loaded and 1 extra round already in the cannon). The cannon was developed from the Panzer III tank main armament, the KwK 39 L/60, and allowed the Me 410 to fire at from a range of 3,000 feet, which put the attacker out of range of the bomberís defensive armament; one hit wwas sufficient to destroy either a B-17 or B-24.  The BK-5 frequently jammed; coupled with the limited ammunition supply and the extra 1,200 lb of the cannon, the heavy bomber destroyer was nearly helpless when confronted by escorts and was the first version of the Me-410 to be taken off operations in 1944. 


          The 1/48 Me-410 first appeared in 1998, released by Pro-Modeler.  The later version with the 50mm cannon was a limited release by Revell in 2003.  In 2013, Meng released a 1/48 Me-410 that could be finished with any of the armament options of the series.  The kit was judged by modelers to be not that much of an advancement over the earlier Monogram kit, though it was priced about four times the price of the earlier kit.


           Construction pretty much starts with the cockpit, which provides good detail if care is taken in painting.  I added seatbelts from an Eduard photoetch set, which is really all that is needed to have a good-looking cockpit.

           Parts fit throughout the kit is good, and I did not use any filler other than getting a good fit with the open armament bay doors that I decided to shut.  Getting the separate canopy structure and the gunsight assembled is fiddly, and one is required as a result to assemble the two-part canopy around those  parts.  I used Micro KrystalKlear white glue to attach these parts together and then attach them to the fuselage so there were no gaps.

           I used Gunze-Sangyo paints, with my own mixtures of RLM74 and RLM75, with the camouflage freehanded.

          For markings, I used an old Aeromaster decal sheet that had been released back when the original kit was released by Pro-Modeler to do an Me-410B-2/U4 of I/ZG 76 as flown in the fall and winter of 1943, since this sheet also included a swastika, which the kit decals did not. 

           When all that was done, I unmasked the canopy and mounted the pilotís and gunnerís hatches in the open position. 


          The Monogram/Revell kit is an underappreciated kit that is still to be found at dealers like Rare Plane Detective and on dealersí tables at model shows, and represents good value at the usual prices of $20-$30, and a kit that builds into a nice model.  It has no insuperable difficulties, the only ďfiddlyĒ bit being the fit and assembly of the two canopy sections.  

Tom Cleaver

May 2015

Review kit courtesy of my wallet.

If you would like your product reviewed fairly and quickly, please contact the editor or see other details in the Note to Contributors.

Back to the Main Page

Back to the Review Index Page